Should drug addicted mothers be sterilized - 2460 Words

Should Drug Addicted Mothers be Sterilized? Sterilization is the surgical process after which a person can no longer reproduce. The process in permanent and irreversible. It is a choice for people but laws are considering to enforce it on the unfortunate group of drug-addicted mothers. The drug-addicted mothers are wholly held responsible for the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), a group of problems that a new born has to face because the mother was dependant on illegal or prescribed drugs. The baby becomes addicted with the mother, and is still dependent on drug at the time of birth. With an increase in the number of babies born addicted to drugs, the lawmakers considered forced sterilization upon drug-addicted mothers as the†¦show more content†¦(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author†, Article 29 â€Å"(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject o nly to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations†, Article 30 â€Å"Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein† † (Charter, United Nations, Chapter III: Organs.). A person might argue, how do these international laws protect human rights for drug-addicted- mothers? The answer for this question lies in the foundation of these laws. Overtime, treaties are considering to address issues regarding social groups that requireShow MoreRelatedCase Study : Not For Sale 1888 Words   |  8 PagesChildren who are being born from drug-addicted mothers often suffer from serious consequences that may affect them for the rest of their lives. Barbara Harris is a foster mother who took in three children from a drug-addicted mother and this experience influenced her to make an effort to prevent drug-addicted women from getting pregnant. She created an organization called CRACK (Children Requiring A Caring Kommunity), which offers $200 to drug addicts who agree to get sterilized or undergo long-term contraceptionRead MoreProject Prevention : A Non Profit Organization1413 Words   |  6 Pagescurrent and former drug addicted men and women an incentive of $300 to commit to use a form of birth control, options include an IUD, oral contraceptives, Depo-Provera or agree to sterilization. Barbara Harris, which is the founder of Project Prevention, adopted four children from the same drug addicted women who could not take care of her children. Barbara Harris cam e up with the idea of the organization when she could not get legislation passes that would have mothers of drug addicted babies be forcedRead MoreDoes Everything Have A Price?947 Words   |  4 Pagesthe right price for their time, but a matter of â€Å"national security† and no one is exempt from the procedures put in place to protect everyone. There is a large amount of pieces that have to come together to get the plane off the ground and waiting should be expected. Safety is not a commodity, but a responsibility shared by everyone and the only way to continue that guarantee is to check everyone thoroughly without offering them to pay to get out of the hassle. While this is a safety issue, notRead MoreThe Role Of Sterilization On The Individual1900 Words   |  8 Pagesâ€Å"Psychological Impact of Sterilization on the Individual,† â€Å"and possess inalienable rights† (45). However, some people would disagree because of how our country has changed since it has become a country. People do not have the freedom in which some believe we should have. In addition, we have advanced beyond most other countries when it comes to opportunities for our people. According to the authors of â€Å"Federally Funded Sterilization: Time to Rethink Policy,† Sonya Borrero, Nikki Zite, and Mitchell D. Creinin:Read MoreEugenics, Eugenics And Selective Breeding2034 Words   |  9 Pagesepileptic, diseased, blind, deaf, deformed, promiscuous or dependent by the state were able to be sterilized by a physician without consent. Although sterilization wasn’t widely supported until the 1920’s, at least 12 states had already passed laws in regards to sterilizing unfit persons. By 1924, nearly 3000 people had been sterilized; 2400 of them were sterilized in California. The states that sterilized the most people involuntarily before the repealing of the laws in 1977 were California, VirginiaRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pageskeep Asians 40 †¢ CHAPTER 1 out of white settler nations around the Pacific. By the 1920s, these techniques had developed into widely accepted principles that migration control was the unilateral prerogative of receiving nations and should properly happen at borders. The modern passport system and common forms of legislation and documentation also began to circulate around the world at that time.65 Since then, the most notable development of these laws has been the constant expansion